Today, HealthLandscape is releasing the Geospatial Brief, “Exploring Competition and Proximity: A Comparison of Basic Methods.” Brief #4 looks
at the importance of including local context when measuring access to health
care providers by comparing two common distance measurement methods with actual
service area data retrieved from the UDS
Mapper.
Configuring and updating the data behind the UDS Mapper is a task
that requires many hours spent looking at the tool to make sure that what
appears on the screen is logical and accurate. As we go through this process
every update cycle, I know that Jennifer will send me her comments based on
towns in Texas, Mark will send his showcasing the northern half of the
Cincinnati metro, and Michael’s will focus on Kentucky. We each tend to focus
on the geographic area that we are most familiar with - either where we’re
from, our where we find ourselves, today.
Last spring, I moved from Cincinnati to a small town just west of
Seattle, Washington. As I explored the Grantees and Access Points in my new
locale during the last UDS Mapper update, I started thinking about
accessibility issues and common ways that people measure distance and proximity
to places they need to go. For example, Google Maps tells me that my house is
21 miles to my favorite coffee shop in downtown Seattle. However, because we
live on the western side of Puget Sound, access to the city isn’t quite as
straightforward as it seems - it requires either a ride on the ferry or an
80-mile drive around the Sound - at least an hour of travel, on a good day. I
wondered whether the Health Center Program grantees on the Seattle side of the
water could draw in patients from my area, and vice versa.
Jené Grandmont, MA HealthLandscape |
No comments:
Post a Comment